rate likelihood of severity of harm if failure occurs for each process step.h. Calculate the Risk P
rate likelihood of severity of harm if failure occurs for each process step.
h. Calculate the Risk Profile Number (Multiply likelihood of occurrence X likelihood of detection X likelihood of severity or harm).
i. Summarize FMEA analysis.
70 ptsIncludes all requirements and provides an excellent failure mode and effects analysis.
63 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a very good failure mode and effects analysis.
56 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic failure mode and effects analysis.
0 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor failure mode and effects analysis.
70 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Ishikawa (Fishbone) Cause and Effect Diagram (1-2 slides)
Requirements:
a. Identify people involved in the identified practice problem.
b. Identify the environment in which the identified practice problem occurs.
c. Identify the materials used.
d. Identify the methods used.
e. Identify the equipment used.
f. Summarize cause and effect analysis.
70 ptsIncludes all requirements and provides an excellent fishbone cause and effect diagram.
63 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a very good fishbone cause and effect diagram.
56 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic fishbone cause and effect diagram.
0 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor fishbone cause and effect diagram.
70 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence-Based Intervention (1 -2 slides)
Requirements:
a. Identify the evidence-based intervention for your identified practice problem idea (listed in PICOT).
b. Identify barriers to overcome based upon what you learned from the FMEA and Fishbone Analyses.
c. Discuss feasibility of the intervention.
50 ptsIncludes all requirements and provides an excellent evidence-based intervention discussion.
45 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a very good evidence-based intervention discussion.
40 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic evidence-based intervention discussion.
0 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor evidence-based intervention discussion.
50 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion (1 slide)
Requirements:
a. Summarize the purpose and findings of the analysis.
b. Provide and justify the main conclusions.
c. Draw inferences from the quality improvement analysis.
20 ptsIncludes all the requirements and provides an excellent conclusion.
18 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and provides a very good conclusion.
16 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic conclusion.
0 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor conclusion.
20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References (1 slide)
Requirements:
a. Include in-text citations used in the presentation.
b. Provide complete matching references in correct APA format.
c. Include minimum of four scholarly sources.
10 ptsIncludes all requirements and provides excellent references.
9 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides very good references.
8 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic references.
0 ptsIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor references.
10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Presentation and Writing
Requirements:
a. Length: Maximum of 14 slides
b. Standard English usage and mechanics
c. APA format guidelines for in-text citation and references
d. Clear
succinct
Solution:
