Our Previous Samples

morbidity and mortality meetings

NRS 493 Topic 4 Literature Evaluation Table Assignment

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

For this NRS 493 Topic 4 Literature Evaluation Table Assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.

While APA style is not required for the body of this NRS 493 Topic 4 Literature Evaluation Table Assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit to LopesWrite.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR NRS 493 Topic 4 Literature Evaluation Table Assignment

NRS 493 Topic 4 Capstone Change Project Outcomes

After working with your preceptor to assess organizational policies, create a list of measurable outcomes for your capstone project intervention. Write a list of three to five outcomes for your proposed intervention. Below each outcome, provide a one or two sentence rationale.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 4 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Practice Experience Conference (Mid-Conference)

Students are required to initiate a mid-conference that will occur during Topic 5, using the  “Practice Experience Conference Form (Mid-Conference)” resource. This conference is intended for the student, preceptor, and faculty to discuss progress toward meeting the learning goals and course objectives contained in the Individual Success Plan (ISP).

Progress toward completing the written capstone project will also be discussed, including faculty recommendations for project development. Student progress will be documented on the Clinical Evaluation Tool (CET), which is submitted in LoudCloud prior to the conference. The CET will be discussed during the mid-conference and graded in LoudCloud by the faculty after the mid-conference. If the student receives an “Unacceptable” or “Below Expectations” in any category, the student will remediate for that category of the CET.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Midterm Evaluation of Student

The preceptor will perform a midterm evaluation with the faculty. The faculty will input the evaluation content into the Lopes Activity Tracker. The student will upload the evaluation into LoudCloud after meeting with the preceptor to discuss the midterm evaluation.

Students must meet all clinical expectations of the course, earn a passing grade on all benchmark assignments, and successfully complete remediation (if necessary) in order to receive a passing grade in the NRS-493 course.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 5 Clinical Practice Experience Remediation

Students who are not making appropriate progress on their capstone project and receive an “Unacceptable” or “Below Expectations” on the CET will be required to complete remediation activities. Required remediation activities are listed on the “NRS-493: Clinical Experience Remediation” document.  The required activities must be submitted in LoudCloud upon their completion by the end of Topic 7.  All required remediation activities will be reviewed and approved by the faculty.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

NRS 493 Topic 4 Literature Evaluation Table Assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary

Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention. Use this assessment when creating the strategic plan.

Write a 150-250 word strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR NRS 493 ASSIGNMENTS

NRS 493 Topic 6 Literature Review

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

1. Title page
2. Introduction section
3. A comparison of research questions
4. A comparison of sample populations
5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 6 Capstone Change Project Resources

Work with your preceptor to assess the organization for required resources needed for the strategic plan if the change proposal were to be implemented. Review your strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented. Write a list of at least four resources you will need in order to implement your change proposal.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 6 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a 150-250 word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 7 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 8 Benchmark Capstone Project Change Proposal

In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Develop a 1,250-1,500 written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

1. Background
2. Clinical problem statement.
3. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system.
4. PICOT question.
5. Literature search strategy employed.
6. Evaluation of the literature.
7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized.
8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.
9. Discussion of how evidence-based practice was used in creating the intervention plan.
10. Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention.
11. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome.
12. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created.

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Question Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

1.1:     Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings.

2.2:     Comprehend nursing concepts and health theories.

3.2:     Implement patient care decisions based on evidence-based practice.

NRS 493 Topic 8 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 9 Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation for Faculty Review and Feedback

Create a professional presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to be disseminated to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Include the intervention, evidence-based literature, objectives, resources needed, anticipated measurable outcomes, and how the intervention would be evaluated. Submit the presentation in LoudCloud for feedback from the instructor.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 9 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR NRS 493 ASSIGNMENTS

NRS 493 Topic 10 Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation

Review the feedback on the change proposal professional presentation and make required adjustments to the presentation. Present your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Be prepared to answer questions and accept feedback.

After presenting your capstone project change proposal, write a 250-350 word summary of the presentation. Include a description of the changes that were suggested by your preceptor before your presentation and how you incorporated that feedback. Describe how this interprofessional collaboration improved the effectiveness of your presentation. Include a description of the feedback and questions from your audience after your presentation, and how this experience will affect your professional practice in the future.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Individual Success Plan (ISP)

The completed Individual Success Plan (ISP) signed off by the preceptor must be submitted to LoudCloud for faculty approval. Student expectations and instructions for completing the ISP document are provided on the “NRS-493 Individual Success Plan” document. Faculty must approve of the completed ISP.  Obtaining preceptor feedback and signature is the responsibility of the student.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Benchmark Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students maintained and submitted weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to explore the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout this course. This assignment combines those entries into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course.

This final submission should also outline what students have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced during the process, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and, finally, how the student met the competencies aligned to this course.

The final journal should address a variable combination of the following, while incorporating your specific clinical practice experiences:

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

2.3:     Understand and value the processes of critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and decision making.

4.1:     Utilize patient care technology and information management systems.

4.3:     Promote interprofessional collaborative communication with health care teams to provide safe and effective care.

5.3:     Provide culturally sensitive care.

5.4:     Preserve the integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients.

NRS 493 Topic 10

NRS-493 Topic 5 Capstone Project Change Proposal Implementation Plan I

NRS-493 Topic 5 Capstone Project Change Proposal Implementation Plan I

Students must formulate an evidence-based and financially feasible strategic plan for their change proposal. Development of a written plan requires an assessment of the organization’s culture, stakeholders, potential challenges, barriers, and obstacles to the implementation of the change proposal. In this topic, students will develop their understanding of cultural aspects related to the organizational environment.

NRS-493 Topic 5 Capstone Project Change Proposal Implementation Plan I Objectives:

1. Assess the organization and community for key stakeholders.
2. Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention.
3. Create a strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention would be implemented in the capstone project change proposal.
4. Integrate reflective practice into the practicum reflective journal.
5. Demonstrate interprofessional collaboration throughout the creation of the capstone project change proposal.

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, ORDER THROUGH BOUTESSAY

NRS-493 Topic 5 Capstone Project Change Proposal Implementation Plan I Tasks

Practice Experience Conference (Mid-Conference)

Students are required to initiate a mid-conference that will occur during Topic 5, using the  “Practice Experience Conference Form (Mid-Conference)” resource. This conference is intended for the student, preceptor, and faculty to discuss progress toward meeting the learning goals and course objectives contained in the Individual Success Plan (ISP).

Progress toward completing the written capstone project will also be discussed, including faculty recommendations for project development. Student progress will be documented on the Clinical Evaluation Tool (CET), which is submitted in LoudCloud prior to the conference.

The CET will be discussed during the mid-conference and graded in LoudCloud by the faculty after the mid-conference. If the student receives an “Unacceptable” or “Below Expectations” in any category, the student will remediate for that category of the CET.

Midterm Evaluation of Student

The preceptor will perform a midterm evaluation with the faculty. The preceptor will input the evaluation content into the Lopes Activity Tracker. The student will upload the evaluation into LoudCloud after meeting with the preceptor to discuss the midterm evaluation.

Students must meet all clinical expectations of the course, earn a passing grade on all benchmark assignments, and successfully complete remediation (if necessary) in order to receive a passing grade in the NRS-493 course.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Clinical Practice Experience Remediation

Students who are not making appropriate progress on their capstone project and receive an “Unacceptable” or “Below Expectations” on the CET will be required to complete remediation activities. Required remediation activities are listed on the “NRS-493: Clinical Experience Remediation” document.  The required activities must be submitted in LoudCloud upon their completion by the end of Topic 7.  All required remediation activities will be reviewed and approved by the faculty.

Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Capstone Project Change Proposal Sample Student Work

Background

Falls are a reoccurring and expensive issue in healthcare. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, each year $50 billion is spent as a result of non-injury falls, and $754 million is spent as a result of fatal falls (CDC, 2020). It is crucial for healthcare facilities to take the appropriate and necessary measures in hopes of minimizing these occurrences.

The topic of falls is one that should concern all healthcare workers, as each and every one plays a role in prevention. Many facilities have fall policies and procedures in place that focus solely on a single fall contributing factor. The current literature, however, suggests that the most effective way to prevent falls is through the implementation of multifactorial fall prevention intervention.

This paper will discuss the effectiveness of multifactorial fall prevention interventions and provide some examples of these interventions.

Problem Statement

Falls are accompanied with a significant financial cost, as well as physical and psychological costs to the patient. Falls can lead to fractures, loss of independence, increased length of stays, quality of life changes, and even death to the patient (Wallis, A., 2021). When asked, staff members have also reported feeling helpless and frustrated about their inability to control falls (Vlaeyen, E., 2017).

There are numerous and varying causes of falls, therefore the efforts to prevent falls should also vary. Falls can occur as a result of improper or lack of use of mobility aids, changes in mentation or coordination, weakness, impaired vision, side effects of medication, and/or chronic diseases. A decrease in frequency of falls would result in a decrease in fall related injuries, costs and deaths, improved patient outcomes and safety, improved quality of life, and decrease in length of patient stays.

Due to the above, there is a dire need to promote increased fall prevention practices in healthcare. The use of multifactorial fall approaches is identified by the Joint Commission as a evidence-based tool (Arrah, 2020).

Purpose of Change Proposal

The purpose of this change proposal project is to decrease the frequency of falls through the implementation of multifactorial fall prevention interventions, specifically for patients residing either short-term or long-term in long-term care facilities.

This change proposal aims at implementing various fall prevention interventions on a patient specific basis. By identifying the patient specific fall risk and implementing prevention measures based on that patient’s risk factors patient safety is being promoted for each individual.

PICOT Question

The PICOT question being focused on in this capstone project is as follow: For residents at Crossroads Care Center in Sun Prairie, WI (P) does the use of multifactorial fall risk interventions (I) reduce the future risk of falls (C) compared to single fall risk interventions (O)?

Literature Search

In order to discover relevant literature, the writer first identified reliable databases to search for said literature. The databases utilized in this paper were found through the Grand Canyon University (GCU) library website resources. The databases chosen from the GCU library were EBSCOhost, CINAHL, and PubMed. Another database utilized was Google Scholar.

These databases were searched using combinations of the keywords “fall interventions”, “long-term care facility”, “eldery or geriatric”, and “multifactorial or multicomponent or multi-interventional”. The search excluded articles that did not fit the criteria of being peer-reviewed and published within the last five years.

Also Read:

NRS 493 Grand Canyon University Scholarly Virtual Tools Activities Discussion

NRS-493 Professional Capstone and Practicum Assignments

Evaluation of Literature

All of the articles chosen for this project were related to the PICOT question above, as well as peer-reviewed and published within the last five years. The research questions in the articles were all centered around multifactorial fall preventions interventions, but the specific focus of each article chosen varied.

The focuses include the effectiveness, costs and benefits, barriers and facilitators, and the long-term effects of multifactorial fall prevention. Two of the articles focused more specifically on the number of falls and reducing this number, while one article focused on the use of patient safety agreements in combination with other interventions to form a multifactorial fall prevention program.

The sample populations identified in each of the articles also large variability. The populations include residents in nursing homes and or long-term care facilities or rehabilitation units in the Netherlands, large southeastern metropolitan areas, Wisconsin, North Caroline, Virginia, Maryland and Texas, Quebec, Ontario and other mid-size Canadian cities, and New South Wales.

Another group of articles focuses specifically on those 65 years or older in an acute hospital setting, in Europe, North America, Oceania, and Asia, and one study includes the study of over 19,000 older adults living in the community.

Change Theory

The nursing change theory identified and chosen by the writer in this proposal project is the nudge theory. Instead of steps, the nudge theory identifies seven principles. These principles include defining changes, consider employee point of view, provide evidence to show the best options, present change as a choice, listen to employee feedback, limit options, solidify change with short-term wins.

This change theory is the most effective for this change proposal because it educates those effected by the practice change with the evidence that supports the change, as well as gives them an opportunity to provide their feedback, voice their concerns and ask questions. This also allows the management that is implementing he proposal to make any needed changes based on that feedback prior to fulling implementing the change.

Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures

The change proposal will be presented to the department heads and upon approval will be implemented beginning with current residents that have endured a fall within the last month, and further extending to any new admissions. These residents will be evaluated using a Morse fall risk scale. Based on this result, specific fall risk factors will be determined and fall prevention interventions will be implemented to prevent future falls.

Each individual fall prevent plan will include medication review and a form of physical activity a minimum of 3 times a week. This physical activity may include physical and/or occupational therapy, independent or accompanied walking for leisure, or facility organized activities. Facility organized activities may include chair exercise, bowling, balloon volleyball, ping-pong, and pool noodle strength training.

Other interventions may include patient safety agreements, low bed, placement near nurses’ station, non-slid socks, education of patient, staff, and or family, increased frequency of rounding, and proper instruction of use of mobility aids. The outcomes of the change would be assessed by comparing the number of falls in the facility before and after the change, as well as the number of falls per specific resident in a month time period before and after the change.

Use of Evidence-Based Practice in Implementation

There are countless evidence-based studies based on falls, with many of those studies identifying that the use of multicomponent is effective in preventing and/or decreasing the occurrences of falls, as well as decreasing fall related costs overtime. In evaluation of the articles there was multiple common themes.

Each of the articles concluded that the use of multifactorial fall prevention interventions were effective at either preventing and reducing falls or decreasing fall related costs. In relation to the specific interventions identified, exercise and medication review were identified in six of eight articles. Therefore, each patient that is identified as a high fall risk, or that has a history of falls, must have both of these interventions initiated.

Potential Barrier

As with all change, there is the potential for some barriers to arise. Some potential barriers include determination from management that a change is not indicated or noncompliance from staff or residents. Although a need for new procedure in order to decrease the frequency of falls has been identified by the Director of Nursing for Crossroads Care Center, this does not ultimately determine that the department heads will identify this change project as the desired new procedure.

If approved and implemented by management, staff and/or residents may be noncompliant with the new practice. A change in practice my cause resistance from either of the above. It is the goal that since staff are being included in the implementation through the nudge change theory that they will be compliant. The residents, however, are mostly elderly and may not be willing to following the changes.

Conclusion

Falls in healthcare are financially, physically, and psychologically costly. Falls can increase cost, lengthen stays, cause injury, and even death. Not all falls are preventable, but it is the responsibility of the nurses and other healthcare workers to take the necessary steps to control factors that may lead to falls. Through the implementation of multifactorial fall prevention intervention protocol, staff have the ability to prevent falls as a result of varying causes.

NRS-493 Topic 5 Capstone Project Change Proposal Implementation Plan I Resources

• Arrah L Bargmann, BSN, RN, Stacey M Brundrett, MSN, RN, AGCNS-BC, Implementation of a Multicomponent Fall Prevention Program: Contracting With Patients for Fall Safety, Military Medicine, Volume 185, Issue Supplement_2, May-June 2020, Pages 28–34, https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz411
• Cost of Older Adult Falls. (2020, July 9). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/falls/data/fall-cost.html
• Jackson, Karen. (2016). Improving nursing home falls management program by enhancing standard of care with collaborative care multi-interventional protocol focused on fall prevention. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 6. 10.5430/jnep.v6n6p84.
• Hopewell S, Copsey B, Nicolson P, et alMultifactorial interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 41 trials and almost 20 000 participantsBritish Journal of Sports Medicine 2020;54:1340-1350.
• Lee, S. H., & Yu, S. (2020). Effectiveness of multifactorial interventions in preventing falls among older adults in the community: A systematic review and meta-analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 106. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103564
• Ma, C. L. K., & Morrissey, R. A. (2020). Reducing falls through the implementation of a multicomponent intervention on a rural mixed rehabilitation ward. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 28(4), 408–https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/ajr.12646
•  Panneman, M. J. M., Sterke, C. S., Eilering, M. J., Blatter, B. M., Polinder, S., & Van Beeck, E. F. (2021). Costs and benefits of multifactorial falls prevention in nursing homes in the Netherlands. Experimental Gerontology, 143. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.exger.2020.111173
• Vlaeyen, E., Stas, J., Leysens, G., Van der Elst, E., Janssens, E., Dejaeger, E., Dobbels, F., & Milisen, K. (2017). Implementation of fall prevention in residential care facilities: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 70, 110–121. https://doi- org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.002
• Wallis, A., Aggar, C., & Massey, D. (2021). Multifactorial falls interventions for people over 65 years in the acute hospital setting: An integrative review. Collegian. https://doi- org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2021.05.003

NRS-493 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Rubric

Course CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-493NRS-493-O502Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal0.01CriteriaPercentage1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)3: Satisfactory (79.00%)4: Good (89.00%)5: Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedGroup 1100.0%New Practice Approaches8.0%New practice approaches are not present.New practice approaches are present, but they are incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporate additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)8.0%Interprofessional collaboration information is not present.Interprofessional collaboration information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Interprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Interprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Interprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems8.0%Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)8.0%Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is not present.Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)8.0%Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is not present.Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)8.0%Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is not present.Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Population Health Concerns8.0%Information regarding population health concerns is not present.Information regarding population health concerns is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information regarding population health concerns is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Information regarding population health concerns is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information regarding population health concerns is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)8.0%Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Health Policy8.0%Health policy information is not present.Health policy information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Health policy information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Health policy information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Health policy information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Leadership and Economic Models8.0%Information on leadership and economic models is not present.Information on leadership and economic models is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Health Disparities8.0%Information on health disparities is not present.Information on health disparities is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information on health disparities is present Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Outline of Overall Personal Discovery8.0%Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is not present.Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)4.0%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Total Weightage100%

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, ORDER THROUGH BOUTESSAY

Strategic Plan Summary

Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention. Use this assessment when creating the strategic plan.

• Write a 150-250 word strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal.
• APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Lopes Activity Tracker Submission

Document your clinical practice hours using the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT) in your student portal. Once you have opened the app, click on the link for your class to record your hours. Clinical practice hours should be documented and submitted within 48 hours of the clinical experience. After the hours have been submitted, the preceptor will verify the hours, which are then reviewed by the faculty.

Download the electronic summary of your practicum experience from the Lopes Activity Tracker. Save the file and submit it though the assignment dropbox for faculty approval.

This report is to be submitted in every topic.

NRS-493 Topic 5 Capstone Project Change Proposal Implementation Plan I Topic 5 DQ 1

Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation. Consider your internal stakeholders, such as the facility, unit, or health care setting where the change proposal is being considered, and your external stakeholders, like an individual or group outside the health care setting. Why is their support necessary to the success of your change proposal, and how you will go about securing that support?

NRS-493 Topic 5 Capstone Project Change Proposal Implementation Plan I
Topic 5 DQ 2

Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects, through either support or integration or both. Name at least one technology that could improve the implementation process and the outcomes of your capstone project change proposal. Do you plan to use this technology? If not, what are the barriers that prevent its use?

NRS-493 Topic 5 Capstone Project Change Proposal Implementation Plan I
Study Materials

Inside Looking In or Inside Looking Out? How Leaders Shape Cultures Equipped for Evidence-Based Practice

Read “‘Inside Looking In’ or ‘Inside Looking Out’? How Leaders Shape Cultures Equipped for Evidence-Based Practice,” by Halm, from American Journal of Critical Care (2010).

URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN275158559&site=eds-live&scope=site

Defining What Evidence Is, Linking It to Patient Outcomes, and Making It Relevant to Practice: Insight From Clinical Nurses

Read “Defining What Evidence Is, Linking It to Patient Outcomes, and Making It Relevant to Practice: Insight From Clinical Nurses,” by Jeffs, Beswick, Lo, Campbell, Ferris, and Sidani, from Applied Nursing Research (2013).

URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN336184640&site=eds-live&scope=site

Best Practice in Nursing: A Concept Analysis

Read “Best Practice in Nursing: A Concept Analysis,” by Nelson, from International Journal of Nursing Studies (2014).

URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103894941&site=eds-live&scope=site

Research at the Bedside: It Makes a Difference

Read “Research at the Bedside: It Makes a Difference,” by Bridges, from American Journal of Critical Care (2015).

URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://s

and successfully complete remediation (if necessary) in order to receive a passing grade in the NRS 493 Topic 5 Midterm Evaluation of Student Assessment. If there are any competencies on the final evaluation that are “Below Expectations

each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment

NRS 493 Topic 5 Midterm Evaluation of Student Assessment

NRS 493 Topic 5 Midterm Evaluation of Student Assessment

The preceptor will perform a midterm evaluation with the faculty. The faculty will input the evaluation content into the Lopes Activity Tracker. The student will upload the evaluation into LoudCloud after meeting with the preceptor to discuss the midterm evaluation.

Students must meet all clinical expectations of the course, earn a passing grade on all benchmark assignments, and successfully complete remediation (if necessary) in order to receive a passing grade in the NRS-493 course.

This NRS 493 Topic 5 Midterm Evaluation of Student Assessment assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 5 Clinical Practice Experience Remediation

Students who are not making appropriate progress on their capstone project and receive an “Unacceptable” or “Below Expectations” on the CET will be required to complete remediation activities. Required remediation activities are listed on the “NRS-493: Clinical Experience Remediation” document.  The required activities must be submitted in LoudCloud upon their completion by the end of Topic 7.  All required remediation activities will be reviewed and approved by the faculty.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary

Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention. Use this assessment when creating the strategic plan.

Write a 150-250 word strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 6 Literature Review

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

1. Title page
2. Introduction section
3. A comparison of research questions
4. A comparison of sample populations
5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Literature Evaluation Table Example 

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

CriteriaArticle 1Article 2Article 3Article 4Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Zheng, F., Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Deng, L. (2019). Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of diabetes research, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1073131Nassar, C. M., Montero, A., & Magee, M. F. (2019). Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models. Current diabetes reports, 19(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1222-6Lee, S. K., Shin, D. H., Kim, Y. H., & Lee, K. S. (2019). Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183323Chatterjee, S., Davies, M. J., Heller, S., Speight, J., Snoek, F. J., & Khunti, K. (2018). Diabetes structured self-management education programs: a narrative review and current innovations. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 6(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30239-5Article Title and Year Published Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China, 2019Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models, 2019Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, 2019Diabetes structured self-management education programs, 2018Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)  Is a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program effective?Do hospitals face challenges in delivering inpatient diabetes education with the increase in readmission and hospitalizations?How does applying customized diabetes management programs through pattern management affect individual self-care behaviors and self-efficacy in patients with type two diabetes mellitus?What improvements have been seen in self-management diabetes education programs during the last two decades?Purposes/Aim of StudyAssessing the effectiveness of a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education programProviding an overview of the current state of inpatient diabetes education using the existing guidelines and education models.Investigating the effect of applying customized diabetes education programs on patients’ self-care behaviors and self-efficacy.Assessing the improvement in self-management diabetes education programs.Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Single-blinded randomized control studySummary overview of the existing diabetes education models.Nonequivalent control group pretest-protest designNarrative review.Setting/Sample 60 patients in an outpatients department Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDiabetes-Specialty care models and diabetes-non-specialty care models were reviewed.Type 2 diabetes patients of age 18-70 who visited the hospital between March 2017 and September 2017Existing self-management diabetes education programsMethods: Intervention/Instruments A two-group experimental design was used.Diabetes Education models Summary reviewpretest-posttest design to test the effects of PM-based diabetes education utilizing CGMS results of patients with diabetesSystematic reviews of diabetes self-management education programs done between 2012 and 2017Analysis SDSDA, PAID, FBG, postprandrial2 hblood glucose and HbA1c tests were all performed to evaluate the effects of interventions for both groups before andAfter three months.The existing inpatient diabetes education models were discussed according to their reported outcomes.The effects on self-efficacy and self-care behavior were analyzed using ANOVA. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 22Analysis of the evidence-based reports of the articles reviewed.Key Findings For the control group, Scores of the diabetes self-care activities significantly improved in the intervention group after the intervention.Inpatient diabetes education should provide survival skills for self-management upon discharge until more outpatient education is provided.Positive changes in self-care behavior were observed. Self-care behaviors improved after diabetes education programs.There is an increase in self-empowerment in self–management diabetes education models. There is an integration of psychosocial models in diabetes education.Recommendations Diabetes self-management education can improve psychological conditions and glycemic control in T2DM.Both diabetes specialty care models and diabetes non-specialty care models can be used successfully for inpatient diabetes education.Customized diabetes education programs specific to each patient’s characteristics should be developed.Psychosocial issues and communication should be considered in self-management education.Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project The article provides evidence of the impact of education on patients with type 2 diabetes. The article shows that well-structured education is the basis of patient responsibility and increases patient self-management.The article provides an overview of inpatient patient education. It shows the superiority of structured education to other forms of patient education. It offers alternatives for patient education.The article introduces the importance of education in increasing self-efficacy and self-management. It supports that patient education is the best intervention to improve self-efficacy and self-management because diabetes care is highly dependent on patients’ interventions.The study shows that structured education programs utilizing nursing terminologies are the best interventions to deliver quality education. The standardized terminologies are vital in covering patients’ differences.CriteriaArticle 5Article 6Article 7Article 8Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Seixas, M. B., Pereira, D. S., Cisneros, L. L., Ezequiel, D. G. A., Aultman, C., Sandison, N., Oh, P., & da Silva, L. P. (2021). Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study. BMC public health, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11300-yXu, G., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Du, Y., Snetselaar, L. G., Hu, F. B., & Bao, W. (2018). Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study. BMJ, 362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1497Rahaman, H. S., Jyotsna, V. P., Sreenivas, V., Krishnan, A., & Tandon, N. (2018). Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 22(1), 74. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_148_17Galaviz, K. I., Weber, M. B., Straus, A., Haw, J. S., Narayan, K. V., & Ali, M. K. (2018). Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose. Diabetes Care, 41(7), 1526-1534. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2222Article Title and Year Published Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study, 2021Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study, 2018Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study.Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose, 2018Research Questions (Qualitative)/ Hypothesis (Quantitative) Can there be a diabetes education program that is specifically applicable to Brazilians living with diabetes?How prevalent is diabetes type 1 and 2 among us adults?How effective is the foot care education module that the team had developed?Can LSM strategies implemented under real-world conditions lower diabetes risk and promote weight loss?Purposes/Aim of StudyDevelop a diabetes patient education program applicable to the Brazilian population living with diabetes.Estimating the prevalence of diagnosed cases of diabetes type 1 and 2 in the U.S. general population and the proportion among U.S. adults.Assessing the effectiveness of a foot care education module the authors had developed.The purpose of this study was to synthesize global evidence on the impact of LSM strategies on diabetes incidence and risk factors in one parsimonious model.Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Narrative of existing diabetes education programsNationwide, population-based, cross-sectional surveyRandomized controlled studyEpidemiological study designSetting/Sample Both inpatient and outpatient Brazilians living with diabetes. Diabetes patient educatorsNational health interview survey 2016 and 2017. U.S. adults aged 20 and above165 Adult patients diagnosed with Diabetes type 1 or 2 attending endocrinology from July 2015 to December 2016PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies published between January 1990 and April 2015.Methods: Intervention/ Instruments Review of the development process of diabetes patient education programs.Data was collected through NHIS and standardized questionnaires.Block randomization was used to divide the patients into a control group and an intervention groupMeta-analysis was used to obtain evidence of the effectsAnalysis Best practices in diabetes education programs in Brazil and South America were analyzed using systematic reviews.Data were statistically analyzed using survey weights.Randomized control trials were used to analyze the effect of healthcare education on foot care knowledge and behavior in diabetes patients.random-effects meta-analysis techniques were applied to obtain a pooled pre/post mean difference for weight and glucose outcomes among intervention participantsKey Findings Development phases of a diabetes education program were explained. A program applicable to Brazilian patients was developed.The study provided benchmark estimates on the national prevalence of diagnosed type 1 diabetes (0.5%) and type 2 diabetes (8.5%) among U.S. adults. Among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes accounted for 5.6% and 91.2%, respectively.The module was effective. Persistent change in foot care behavior requires the patient to have reinforcement regularly.The study found that participants receiving an intervention had a 29% lower risk of developing diabetes, lost 1.5 kg more body weight, and reduced FBG by 0.09 mmol/L more than participants not receiving one.Recommendations The program’s effectiveness must be tested in the future as meeting individual needs requires sustained efforts.The study recommends further investigations into the disparities in the prevalence.The study recommends further improvement on the diabetes patient education module.Even though LSM strategies can succeed in diabetes prevention, the study recommends further studies in low-income countries.Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone The article shows the applicability and importance of education in diabetes care. The article provides evidence of increased self-management and better patient education after diabetes education, hence proving the project’s viability.The article provides data on the real-world prevalence of diabetes. It portrays it as a priority clinical problem. In addition, it recommends specific interventions such as mass awareness and patient education to reduce the diabetes healthcare burden.The article reviews the costs of diabetes. It also examines its interventions and preventability. The article recommends rigorous public sensitization and patient education to prevent diabetes and its complications.The article reviews global diabetes prevention interventions. Diabetes education features as an essential intervention in the prevention and prognosis of diabetes.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 6 Capstone Change Project Resources

Work with your preceptor to assess the organization for required resources needed for the strategic plan if the change proposal were to be implemented. Review your strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented. Write a list of at least four resources you will need in order to implement your change proposal.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 6 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a 150-250 word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 7 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s) NRS 493 Topic 5 Midterm Evaluation of Student Assessment.

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 8 Benchmark Capstone Project Change Proposal

In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Develop a 1,250-1,500 written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

1. Background
2. Clinical problem statement.
3. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system.
4. PICOT question.
5. Literature search strategy employed.
6. Evaluation of the literature.
7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized.
8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.
9. Discussion of how evidence-based practice was used in creating the intervention plan.
10. Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention.
11. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome.
12. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created.

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Question Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

1.1:     Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings.

2.2:     Comprehend nursing concepts and health theories.

3.2:     Implement patient care decisions based on evidence-based practice.

NRS 493 Topic 8 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 9 Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation for Faculty Review and Feedback

Create a professional presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to be disseminated to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Include the intervention, evidence-based literature, objectives, resources needed, anticipated measurable outcomes, and how the intervention would be evaluated. Submit the presentation in LoudCloud for feedback from the instructor.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 9 Professional Capstone a

NRS 493 Topic 5 Practice Experience Conference Mid-Conference Papers

NRS 493 Topic 5 Practice Experience Conference Mid-Conference Papers

Students are required to initiate a mid-conference that will occur during Topic 5, using the  “Practice Experience Conference Form (Mid-Conference)” resource. This conference is intended for the student, preceptor, and faculty to discuss progress toward meeting the learning goals and course objectives contained in the Individual Success Plan (ISP). Progress toward completing the written capstone project will also be discussed, including faculty recommendations for project development.

Student progress will be documented on the Clinical Evaluation Tool (CET), which is submitted in LoudCloud prior to the conference. The CET will be discussed during the mid-conference and graded in LoudCloud by the faculty after the mid-conference. If the student receives an “Unacceptable” or “Below Expectations” in any category, the student will remediate for that category of the CET.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Midterm Evaluation of Student

The preceptor will perform a midterm evaluation with the faculty. The faculty will input the evaluation content into the Lopes Activity Tracker. The student will upload the evaluation into LoudCloud after meeting with the preceptor to discuss the midterm evaluation.

Students must meet all clinical expectations of the course, earn a passing grade on all benchmark assignments, and successfully complete remediation (if necessary) in order to receive a passing grade in the NRS-493 course.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 5 Clinical Practice Experience Remediation

Students who are not making appropriate progress on their capstone project and receive an “Unacceptable” or “Below Expectations” on the CET will be required to complete remediation activities. Required remediation activities are listed on the “NRS-493: Clinical Experience Remediation” document.  The required activities must be submitted in LoudCloud upon their completion by the end of Topic 7.  All required remediation activities will be reviewed and approved by the faculty.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary

Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention. Use this assessment when creating the strategic plan.

Write a 150-250 word strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 6 Literature Review

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

1. Title page
2. Introduction section
3. A comparison of research questions
4. A comparison of sample populations
5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 6 Capstone Change Project Resources

Work with your preceptor to assess the organization for required resources needed for the strategic plan if the change proposal were to be implemented NRS 493 Topic 5 Practice Experience Conference Mid-Conference Papers. Review your strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented. Write a list of at least four resources you will need in order to implement your change proposal.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 6 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a 150-250 word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 7 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 8 Benchmark Capstone Project Change Proposal

In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Develop a 1,250-1,500 written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

1. Background
2. Clinical problem statement.
3. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system.
4. PICOT question.
5. Literature search strategy employed.
6. Evaluation of the literature.
7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized.
8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.
9. Discussion of how evidence-based practice was used in creating the intervention plan.
10. Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention.
11. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome.
12. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created.

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Question Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

1.1:     Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings.

2.2:     Comprehend nursing concepts and health theories.

3.2:     Implement patient care decisions based on evidence-based practice.

NRS 493 Topic 8 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 9 Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation for Faculty Review and Feedback

Create a professional presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to be disseminated to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Include the intervention, evidence-based literature, objectives, resources needed, anticipated measurable outcomes, and how the intervention would be evaluated. Submit the presentation in LoudCloud for feedback from the instructor.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 9 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation

Review the feedback on the change proposal professional presentation and make required adjustments to the presentation. Present your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Be prepared to answer questions and accept feedback.

After presenting your capstone project change proposal, write a 250-350 word summary of the presentation. Include a description of the changes that were suggested by your preceptor before your presentation and how you incorporated that feedback. Describe how this interprofessional collaboration improved the effectiveness of your presentation. Include a description of the feedback and questions from your audience after your presentation, and how this experience will affect your professional practice in the future.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Individual Success Plan (ISP)

The completed Individual Success Plan (ISP) signed off by the preceptor must be submitted to LoudCloud for faculty approval. Student expectations and instructions for completing the ISP document are provided on the “NRS-493 Individual Success Plan” document. Faculty must approve of the completed ISP.  Obtaining preceptor feedback and signature is the responsibility of the student.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Benchmark Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students maintained and submitted weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to explore the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout this course. This assignment combines those entries into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course.

This final submission should also outline what students have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced during the process, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and, finally, how the student met the competencies aligned to this course.

The final journal should address a variable combination of the following, while incorporating your specific clinical practice experiences:

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review NRS 493 Topic 5 Practice Experience Conference Mid-Conference Papers rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Practice Experience Conference Mid-Conference Papers Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

2.3:     Understand and value the processes of critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and decision making.

4.1:     Utilize patient care technology and information management systems.

4.3:     Promote interprofessional collaborative communication with health care teams to provide safe and effective care.

5.3:     Provide culturally sensitive care.

5.4:     Preserve the integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Scholarly Activities

Throughout the RN-to-BSN program, students are required to participate in scholarly activities outside of clinical practice or professional practice. Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, journal club, grand rounds, morbidity and mortality meetings, interdisciplinary committees, quality improvement committees, and any other opportunities available at your site, within your community, or nationally.

You are required to post at least one documented scholarly activity by the end of this course. In addition to this submission, you are required to be involved and contribute to interdisciplinary initiatives on a regular basis.

Submit, by way of this assignment, a summary report of the scholarly activity, including who, what, where, when, and any relevant take-home points. Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the scholarly activity as well as future professional goals related to this activity. You may use the “Scholarly Activity Summary” resource to help guide this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Practice Experience Conference (Post-Conference)

Students are required to initiate a Post- Conference that will occur during Topic 10.  This meeting is intended for the student, preceptor, and faculty to discuss the completion of the clinical practice experience, the learning goals contained in the Individual Success Plan (ISP), and course learning objectives.

Completion of the written capstone project change proposal will also be discussed, including preceptor recommendations. Completion of the clinical practice experience will be documented on the “Clinical Evaluation Tool” (CET), which is submitted in LoudCloud prior to the Post- Conference.  The CET will be reviewed during the Post-Conference including recommendations from the preceptor.  Faculty will grade the submitted CET after the conference.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Indirect Clinical Practice Experience

Submit the completed “NRS-493 Indirect Clinical Practice Experience Hours” form to LoudCloud by the end of Topic 10.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 10 Student Evaluation of Preceptor and Site

Access the Lopes Activity Tracker to complete the “Student Evaluation of Preceptor and Site.” Upload and submit the evaluation through the drop box in LoudCloud.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Final Evaluation of Student by Preceptor

The preceptor will complete your final evaluation in the Lopes Activity Tracker.

Both the student and preceptor must sign the form. The final evaluation is completed and submitted by the student to the Dropbox in LoudCloud.

Students must meet all clinical expectations of the course, earn a passing grade on all benchmark assignments, and successfully complete remediation (if necessary) in order to receive a passing grade in the NRS-493 course. If there are any competencies on the final evaluation that are “Below Expectations,” this may result in failure of the course.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Practice Experience Conference Mid-Conference Papers uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

finally

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary Paper

The successful implementation of the nursing practice intervention within our organization necessitates a strategic strategy that carefully considers the unique characteristics and values of our organizational culture. Contemporary society places considerable importance on prioritizing clients’ interests, implementing client-centered care, and fostering effective interprofessional communication. The child’s activities have exhibited favorable behavioral changes due to our emphasis on interprofessional communication, suggesting that our organizational environment fosters a climate that is receptive to transformative initiatives.

To effectively execute the nursing practice intervention within our capstone project change proposal, we will employ a client-centered methodology that is consistent with the metaparadigm of person, environment, health, and nursing as outlined in the Convergent Care Theory (Wei, 2021). This approach places a strong emphasis on prioritizing the needs of the client, promoting their autonomy, and treating them with respect. These principles align well with our organizational values, which include a commitment to upholding individual rights and supporting self-determination.

To effectively incorporate the nursing practice intervention, we will implement a comprehensive approach. This will involve the assessment of current practices, providing comprehensive education to healthcare practitioners regarding the advantages of interventions, and cultivating a shared understanding.

A feedback system will be implemented to continuously evaluate progress and enhance adaptability. Furthermore, we will place significant emphasis on fostering a culture of collaboration and open communication. This will be accompanied by a steadfast dedication to prioritizing client demands in our decision-making procedures, eventually ensuring the successful implementation of the initiative.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary Paper References

Wei H. (2021). The development of an evidence-informed Convergent Care Theory: Working together to achieve optimal health outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 9(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.12.009

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary Paper

Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention. Use this assessment when creating the strategic plan.

Write a 150-250 word strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary Paper Sample Solution

Various barriers may impair implementation when implementing a new change in an organization. These barriers can either be organizational or individual. Among the common barriers is resistance to change. Team members may opt to stick to their previous practice while resisting adapting to the new change. This may be attributed to a lack of knowledge about the proposed change, personal differences, poor communication strategy, or individuals perceiving change to have minimal effects.

Besides, a lack of resources and organizational support for change can impair implementation. For instance, my project, which advocates for the daily use of chlorohexidine to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia, requires a continuous supply of chlorhexidine and wipes to achieve positive outcomes. Failure to access these resources may impinge implementation, resulting in ineffectiveness. However, an exemplary implementation plan would help overcome some of the challenges.

Likewise, I came up with an implementation plan for my project. Because nurses are the intervention group in this project, I will start by surveying them to evaluate their knowledge and attitude toward the proposed evidence-based (EBP) plan. This will help in identifying gaps as well as be used for comparison after implementation of the project. Then, I will conduct sessions to educate nurses about the importance of the EBP.

Demonstration of the EBP will occur concurrently with education. This aims at improving knowledge and skills about the EBP. Besides, I will encourage feedback that help in improving the proposed change.  Launching and monitoring the progress of the change project would follow. Monitoring will help make any modifications that will improve the efficiency of the project. Finally, a resistance handling plan will be put in place to address any resistance that may arise during the implementation of the change project.

NRS 493 Topic 6 Literature Review

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

1. Title page
2. Introduction section
3. A comparison of research questions
4. A comparison of sample populations
5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Ventilator-acquired Pneumonia Literature Review Example Paper

Ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) is among the most common nosocomial infections in patients admitted to the Intensive care unit (ICU). While intubation is a necessity in supporting respiration, it acts as a conduit through which micro-organisms access the lower respiratory tract causing VAP. In addition, other risk factors such as advanced age, reduced immunity, immobility, and supine position increase the risk of VAP. Consequently, VAP negatively affects patient outcomes while increasing the rate of morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization.

The cost of care is also increased. In some cases, the bacteria develop resistance to bacteria, causing a challenge in the management. Therefore, there is a need to adopt a nurse-led initiative that will help in preventing VAP. Various methods have been used. However, there is strong evidence supporting the use of Chlorohexidine (CHG) in reducing microbial load, preventing VAP, and improving patient outcomes.

Such findings have been supported by the literature review I conducted on my PICOT question. Therefore, I recommend the adoption of using CHG to prevent VAP in my institution. This paper will discuss the comparison of the research questions, sample populations, limitations, and the usefulness of the evidence in my project.

PICOT: In adult patients intubated in ICU (P), how does daily use of Chlorohexidine (I) compared to not using (C) reduce the risk of Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia (VAP) (O) over three months? (T)

Comparison of Research Questions

Various studies have focused on different aspects regarding ventilator-acquired pneumonia. For instance, Deschepper et al. (2018) sought to find out the role of CHG in reducing mortality. The question stated, ‘Does the use of chlorohexidine oral care in critical and non-critical patients reduce mortality? D’Journo et al. (2018) stated ‘does the use of CHG prevent respiratory complications post-surgery for patients with lung cancer?

In a meta-analysis by Jackson and Owens (2019), the authors analyzed various randomized control trials (RCT) to assess the effectiveness of CHG in reducing VAP among intubated patients. In another study by Pallotto et al. (2019), the research question stated, ‘can the use of a soap-like solution of 4% CHG followed by water rinsing reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in ICU patients?

Compared to a study by Reagan et al. (2019), which used mathematical analysis to determine the effectiveness of using CHG to reduce the incidences of HAIs and the cost of care, the study by Triamvisit et al. (2021) posed the question of whether the use of modified VAP-care bundle reduces the risk of VAP in neurosurgical patients. Finally, (Urbancic et al. (2018) stated; `does the use of CHG compared to triclosan reduce the rates of HAIs in ICU patients?

Comparison of Sample

The studies presented in the literature were done in different settings for patients with various needs and characteristics. However, it was common for most studies that the sample population comprised of patients admitted to the ICU while nurses intervened for most of the care. Sampling methods and numbers differed in various studies. A retrospective observational study by Deschepper et al. (2018) sampled 82,274 patients while 11,113 patients received CHG. Despite being done in different settings, studies by D’Journo et al. (2018) and Pallotto et al. (2019) sampled 450 patients each and used simple randomization to divide patients into either control or intervention groups.

On the other hand, Reagan et al. (2019) simulated 850 patients from a single center using a mathematical model to analyze the cost of care. Triamvisit et al. (2021) recruited 291 patients from two neurosurgical ICU units. Simple randomization was used to classify 146 participants as control, while 145 formed the cohort group. Finally, a study by Urbancic et al. (2018) followed a total sample of 4262 ICU admissions and compared outcomes.

Comparison of Study Limitations

Despite the literature yielding relevant information, several limitations were highlighted. First, adherence to evidence-based practice (EBP) was a challenge to some nurses leading to incomprehensive results. Some nurses were resistant to change while opting to continue with their prior practices. Furthermore, it wasn’t clear how frequently should CHG be applied to enhance its effectiveness. In addition, the acquisition of resources proved futile in some centers, thus limiting the implementation process. Finally, studies had smaller sample sizes that could not represent the whole population.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Despite VAP being among the common nosocomial infection that impairs patient outcomes, the use of CHG has proved effective in reducing mortality and morbidity associated with it. The ability of CHG to inhibit cell wall integrity makes it effective against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, the major cause of VAP. Therefore, there is a need to equip all nurses with the necessary knowledge on how to apply CHG and adhere to the protocols to prevent VAP.

However, future research should focus on studying issues around the frequency of bathing with CHG, the effectiveness of the various concentrations in reducing VAP, and the adverse effects associated with CHG use. Finally, more randomized control studies should be done while including larger sample sizes that represent the entire population. Essentially, having credible evidence will enhance the adoption of the EBP in various ICU settings and improve healthcare outcomes.

References

Deschepper, M., Waegeman, W., Eeckloo, K., Vogelaers, D., & Blot, S. (2018). Effects of chlorhexidine gluconate oral care on hospital mortality: a hospital-wide, observational cohort study. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(7), 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5171-3

D’Journo, X. B., Falcoz, P.-E., Alifano, M., Le Rochais, J.-P., D’Annoville, T., Massard, G., Regnard, J. F., Icard, P., Marty-Ane, C., Trousse, D., Doddoli, C., Orsini, B., Edouard, S., Million, M., Lesavre, N., Loundou, A., Baumstarck, K., Peyron, F., Honoré, S., … Thomas, P. A. (2018). Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal decontamination with chlorhexidine gluconate in lung cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(5), 578–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5156-2

Jackson, L., & Owens, M. (2019). Does oral care with chlorhexidine reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adults? British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 28(11), 682–689. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.11.682

Pallotto, C., Fiorio, M., De Angelis, V., Ripoli, A., Franciosini, E., Quondam Girolamo, L., Volpi, F., Iorio, P., Francisci, D., Tascini, C., & Baldelli, F. (2019). Daily bathing with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate in intensive care settings: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Microbiology and Infection: The Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 25(6), 705–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.09.012

Reagan, K. A., Chan, D. M., Vanhoozer, G., Stevens, M. P., Doll, M., Godbout, E. J., Cooper, K., Pryor, R. J., Hemphill, R. R., & Bearman, G. (2019). You get back what you give: Decreased hospital infections with improvement in CHG bathing, mathematical modeling, and cost analysis. American Journal of Infection Control, 47(12), 1471–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.07.003

Triamvisit, S., Wongprasert, W., Puttima, C., Chiangmai, M. N., Thienjindakul, N., Rodkul, L., & Jetjumnong, C. (2021). Effect of a modified care bundle for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically-ill neurosurgical patients. Acute and Critical Care, 36(4), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00983

Urbancic, K. F., Mårtensson, J., Glassford, N., Eyeington, C., Robbins, R., Ward, P. B., Williams, D., Johnson, P. D., & Bellomo, R. (2018). Impact of unit-wide chlorhexidine bathing in intensive care on bloodstream infection and drug-resistant organism acquisition. Critical Care and Resuscitation: Journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 20(2), 109–116. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29852849/

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 6 Capstone Change Project Resources

Work with your preceptor to assess the organization for required resources needed for the strategic plan if the change proposal were to be implemented.

Review your strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented. Write a list of at least four resources you will need in order to implement your change proposal.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 6 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes.

Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.

In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a 150-250 word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 7 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes.

Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.

In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Professional Capstone Practicum Essays GCU – Topic 8 Benchmark Capstone Project Change Proposal

In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course.

For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Develop a 1,250-1,500 written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

1. Background
2. Clinical problem statement.
3. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system.
4. PICOT question.
5. Literature search strategy employed.
6. Evaluation of the literature.
7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized.
8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.
9. Discussion of how evidence-based practice was used in creating the intervention plan.
10. Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention.
11. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome.
12. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created.

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Question Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.

Prepare this assignment  according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary Paper uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Also Read:

NRS 493 Topic 1 Individual Success Plan Essay Paper

NRS 493 Grand Canyon University Scholarly Virtual Tools Activities Discussion

NRS 4930507 Grand Canyon University Wk 10 Care Delivery and Clinical Systems Essay

NRS 493 Topic 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan Paper

NRS 493 Topic 6 Capstone Change Project Resources Essay

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

1.1:     Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings.

2.2:     Comprehend nursing concepts and health theories.

3.2:     Implement patient care decisions based on evidence-based practice.

NRS 493 Topic 8 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes.

Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below. In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

NRS 493 Topic 5 Strategic Plan Summary Paper uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 9 Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation for Faculty Review and Feedback

Create a professional presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to be disseminated to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Include the intervention, evidence-based literature, objectives, resources needed, anticipated measurable outcomes, and how the intervention would be evaluated. Submit the presentation in LoudCloud for feedback from the instructor.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 9 Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes.

Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course.

Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS 493 Topic 10 Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation

Review the feedback on the change proposal professional presentation and make required adjustments to the presentation. Present your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Be prepared to answer questions and accept feedback.

After presenting your capstone project change proposal, write a 250-350 word summary of the presentation. Include a description of the changes that were suggested by your preceptor before your presentation and how you incorporated that feedback.

Describe how this interprofessional collaboration improved the effectiveness of your presentation. Include a description of the feedback and questions from your audience after your presentation, and how this experience will affect your professional practice in the future.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

<

an inadequate resource is a trigger for nursing burnout which can limit implementation and reduce the quality of care. Therefore