NRS 493 RS4 Literature Evaluation TableLiterature Evaluation TableCriteriaArticle 1Article 2Article

---

NRS 493 RS4 Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

CriteriaArticle 1Article 2Article 3Article 4Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

Zheng, F., Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Deng, L. (2019). Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of diabetes research, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1073131

 

Nassar, C. M., Montero, A., & Magee, M. F. (2019). Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models. Current diabetes reports, 19(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1222-6

 

Lee, S. K., Shin, D. H., Kim, Y. H., & Lee, K. S. (2019). Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183323

 

Chatterjee, S., Davies, M. J., Heller, S., Speight, J., Snoek, F. J., & Khunti, K. (2018). Diabetes structured self-management education programs: a narrative review and current innovations. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 6(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30239-5Article Title and Year Published

 

Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China, 2019Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models, 2019Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, 2019Diabetes structured self-management education programs, 2018Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

Is a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program effective?Do hospitals face challenges in delivering inpatient diabetes education with the increase in readmission and hospitalizations?How does applying customized diabetes management programs through pattern management affect individual self-care behaviors and self-efficacy in patients with type two diabetes mellitus?What improvements have been seen in self-management diabetes education programs during the last two decades?Purposes/Aim of StudyAssessing the effectiveness of a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program 

Providing an overview of the current state of inpatient diabetes education using the existing guidelines and education models.

Investigating the effect of applying customized diabetes education programs on patients’ self-care behaviors and self-efficacy.Assessing the improvement in self-management diabetes education programs.Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

Single-blinded randomized control studySummary overview of the existing diabetes education models.Nonequivalent control group pretest-protest designNarrative review.Setting/Sample

 

60 patients in an outpatients department Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDiabetes-Specialty care models and diabetes-non-specialty care models were reviewedType 2 diabetes patients of age 18-70 who visited the hospital between March 2017 and September 2017Existing self-management diabetes education programsMethods: Intervention/Instruments

 

Two-group experimental design was used. Diabetes Education models Summary reviewpretest-posttest design to test the effects of PM-based diabetes education utilizing CGMS results of patients with diabetesSystematic reviews of diabetes self-management education programs done between 2012 and 2017Analysis

 

SDSDA, PAID, FBG, postprandrial2 h

blood glucose, and HbA1c tests were all performed to evaluate

the effects of interventions for both groups before and

After three months.

The existing inpatient diabetes education models were discussed in line with their reported outcomesThe effects on self-efficacy and self-care behavior were analyzed using ANOVA. Collected data was analyzed using SPSS version 22Analysis of the evidence-based reports of the articles reviewed.Key Findings

 

For the control group, Scores of the diabetes self-care activities significantly improved in the intervention group after the interventionInpatient diabetes education should provide survival skills for self-management upon discharge until more outpatient education is provided.Positive changes in self-care behavior were observed. Self-care behaviors improved after diabetes education programsThere is an increase in self-empowerment in self–management diabetes education models. There is an integration of psychosocial models in diabetes education.Recommendations

 

Diabetes self-management education can improve psychological conditions and glycemic control in T2DM.Both diabetes specialty care models and diabetes non-specialty care models can be used successfully for inpatient diabetes education.Customized diabetes education programs specific to each patient’s characteristics should be developed.Psychosocial issues and communication should be considered in self-management education.Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

The article provides evidence of the impact of education on patients with type 2 diabetes. The article shows that well-structured education is the basis of patient responsibility and increases patient self-management.The article provides an overview of inpatient patient education. It shows the superiority of structured education to other forms of patient education. It also alternatives for patient education.The article introduces the importance of education in increasing self-efficacy and self-management. It supports that patient education is the best intervention to improve self-efficacy and self-management because diabetes care is highly dependent on patients’ interventions.The study shows that structured education programs utilizing nursing terminologies are the best interventions to deliver quality education. The standardized terminologies are vital in covering patients’ differences

 

 

CriteriaArticle 5Article 6Article 7Article 8Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Seixas, M. B., Pereira, D. S., Cisneros, L. L., Ezequiel, D. G. A., Aultman, C., Sandison, N., Oh, P., & da Silva, L. P. (2021). Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study. BMC public health, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11300-y

 

 

Xu, G., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Du, Y., Snetselaar, L. G., Hu, F. B., & Bao, W. (2018). Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study. Bmj, 362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1497

 

Rahaman, H. S., Jyotsna, V. P., Sreenivas, V., Krishnan, A., & Tandon, N. (2018). Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 22(1), 74. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_148_17Galaviz, K. I., Weber, M. B., Straus, A., Haw, J. S., Narayan, K. V., & Ali, M. K. (2018). Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose. Diabetes Care, 41(7), 1526-1534. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2222

 

Article Title and Year Published

 

Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study, 2021Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study, 2018Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study.Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose, 2018Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

Can there be a diabetes education program that is specifically applicable to Brazilians living with diabetes?How prevalent is diabetes type 1 and 2 among us adults?How effective is the foot care education module that the team had developed?Can LSM strategies implemented under real-world conditions lower diabetes risk and promote weight loss?Purposes/Aim of StudyDevelop a diabetes patient education program applicable to the Brazilian population living with diabetes.Estimating the prevalence of diagnosed total diabetes type 1 and 2 in the U.S. general population and the proportion among U.S. adults.Assessing the effectiveness of a foot care education module the authors had developed.The purpose of this study was to synthesize global evidence on the impact of LSM strategies on diabetes incidence and risk factors in one parsimonious model.Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

Narrative of existing diabetes education programsNationwide, population-based, cross-sectional surveyRandomized controlled studyEpidemiological study designSetting/Sample

 

Both inpatient and outpatient Brazilians living with diabetes. Diabetes patient educatorsNational health interview survey 2016 and 2017. U.S. adults aged 20 and above165 Adult patients diagnosed with Diabetes type 1 or 2 attending endocrinology from July 2015 to December 2016PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies published between January 1990 and April 2015.Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

Review of the development process of diabetes patient education programs.Data was collected through NHIS and standardized questionnaires.Block randomization was used to divide the patients into a control group and an intervention groupMeta-analysis was used to obtain evidence of the effectsAnalysis

 

Best practices in diabetes education programs in Brazil and South America were analyzed using systematic reviews.Data was statistically analyzed using survey weights.Randomized control trials were used to analyze the effect of healthcare education on foot care knowledge and behavior in diabetes patients.random-effects meta-analysis techniques were applied to obtain a pooled pre/post mean difference for weight and glucose outcomes among intervention participantsKey Findings

 

Development phases of a diabetes education program were explained. A program applicable to Brazilian patients was developed.The study provided benchmark estimates on the national prevalence of diagnosed type 1 diabetes (0.5%) and type 2 diabetes (8.5%) among U.S. adults. Among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes accounted for 5.6% and 91.2%, respectively.The module was effective. Persistent change in foot care behavior requires the patient to have reinforcement regularly.The study found that participants receiving an intervention had a 29% lower risk of developing diabetes, lost 1.5 kg more body weight, and reduced FBG by 0.09 mmol/L more than participants not receiving one.Recommendations

 

 

The program’s effectiveness must be tested in the future as meeting individual needs requires sustained efforts.

The study recommends further investigations into the disparities in the prevalenceThe study recommends further improvement on the diabetes patient education moduleEven though LSM strategies can succeed in diabetes prevention, the study recommends further studies in low-income countries.Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

The article shows the applicability and importance of education in diabetes care. The article provides evidence of increased self-management and better patient education after diabetes education, hence proving the project’s viability.The article provides data on the real-world prevalence of diabetes. It portrays it as a priority clinical problem. In addition, it recommends specific interventions such as mass awareness and patient education to reduce the diabetes healthcare burden.The article reviews the costs of diabetes. It also reviews its interventions and preventability. The article recommends rigorous public sensitization and patient education to prevent diabetes and its complicationsThe article reviews the global diabetes prevention interventions. Diabetes education features as an essential intervention in the prevention and prognosis of diabetes.

 

 

 

---

Solution: