iCARE Paper NR451 Assignment
The purpose of the iCARE Paper assignment is to explore the concept of interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Nursing supportive actions of compassion, advocacy, resilience, and evidence-based practice will serve as a way to apply care concepts.
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Submit your completed assignment by Sunday end of Week 5 by 11:59 p.m. MT.
The assignment is worth 200 points.
The prepared paper template is RECOMMENDED for this assignment.
iCare Assignment Template. – APA 7th edition
Only the APA 7th edition is to be used in this assignment.
**Academic Integrity**
As detailed in the Simple Syllabus, all required Chamberlain papers, discussions or other written learning activities are subject to submission for detection of plagiarism to Turnitin ® or other anti-plagiarism software. Remember, Chamberlain’s philosophy is Integrity Matters so please use all resources within your course and your instructor if you have any questions or need assistance with this assignment.
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
The care management specialty pays attention to the coordination of care and effective and efficient utilization of resources to offer patients with chronic illnesses the highest quality of care during their stay in the hospital. Educating the patients, advocating for their wellness, and communicating clearly are vital to ensure their health outcomes are enhanced in the long run. It necessitates employing an interdisciplinary team with workers from other fields to ensure patients receive holistic care that suits their needs.
To ensure that this existing interdisciplinary team offers better healthcare, it is essential to employ open communication and availing of information to the team members on time. The application of resilience and compassion skills when dealing with these patients is essential to implementing practice based on scientific evidence. Despite these valuable interventions in place to ensure that patients receive the highest quality of care, the healthcare sector still faces challenges that hinder progress, requiring novel solutions.
Compassion helps healthcare workers show kindness and understanding of patients and their loved ones, which is essential in achieving high-quality health outcomes. Forging supportive relationships based on trust has helped increase satisfaction and boost the best customer experience and entails a good show of compassion from the healthcare workers (Straughair & Machin, 2020). Compassion ensures clients receive social, psychological, physical, and emotional needs, thus promoting holistic care. To encourage compassion, an interprofessional team should ensure that the patient and family are involved in the client’s care.
The team can provide essential information about the client’s health status and involve them in decision-making about any procedures the patient will likely undergo. The team must seek informed consent from the patient or their family members if they cannot make sound decisions independently. The patient and the family will ultimately increase their trust in the interdisciplinary team and heed the interventions formulated by the team. A safety culture is forged when patients and families are involved in their care, which can increase the organization’s reputation (Son?ur et al., 2018).
Healthcare workers can enhance advocacy by understanding patients’ unique needs, values, and beliefs. Advocacy involves the healthcare workers standing by what the patients believe is right for them in their absence and ensuring their voice is heard during decision-making. Through advocacy, the patient’s autonomy is respected through a third party, the nurse overseeing the care of the patients. The nurse can communicate openly with the client and present them with facts so that they can apply them in making decisions, which the nurse ensures are considered by other interdisciplinary teams when tailoring interventions (Abbasinia et al., 2019).
Nurses can aid in fostering a culture of patient-centered care by making the advocacy of patients a top priority and promoting teamwork among healthcare professionals. Better patient experience and clinical outcomes may result from this shift in attitude on the healthcare team. Evidence suggests that a patient-centered culture helps to decrease the number of hospitalizations and a general improvement in the quality of care of all patients.
Promoting effective collaboration and open communication channels among the different interdisciplinary teams in the hospital can promote resilience. Resilient healthcare personnel can deal with the stresses of their jobs without letting them affect their health or performance. Resilience is the capacity to deal with hardship while providing excellent patient care. Heavy workloads, extended shift hours, psychological demands, and experiencing traumatic events entail pressures that healthcare employees experience (Odom-Forren, 2020). Because of their resilience, they can overcome these challenges and continue providing excellent patient treatment.
Resilient healthcare providers are better equipped to deal with difficult situations, keep a positive attitude, and communicate effectively with patients and their families (Odom-Forren, 2020). They are not likely to suffer from burnout, which is associated with dissatisfaction with one’s work and an increased likelihood of making mistakes in patient care. Resilience can help keep workers motivated to provide high-quality healthcare to their patients, devoid of errors, which can help achieve the organization’s mission and vision.
Carrying out regular interdepartmental sessions to enlighten the healthcare workers about relevant changes in guidelines in managing healthcare conditions and new evidence that supports those changes can help foster evidence-based practice. Along with other medical experts, nurses can learn from one another at these conferences and improve their ability to give patients evidence-based care. Encouraging an approach based on scientific evidence, applied by interprofessional teams, the organization’s culture can value the inception of interventions based on the current evidence and research in informing patient care (Son?ur et al., 2018).
The healthcare outcomes are likely to improve since interventions backed up with credible scientific findings can help enhance the overall quality of care and complications experienced by patients and promote increased patient satisfaction. The organization’s reputation improves, and reimbursements are likely to increase. When workers apply evidence-based interventions and see improved patient outcomes, they can become highly motivated and will likely work for longer in the organization, decreasing employee turnover.
Employment of the iCARE components can help increase patient satisfaction, enhance patient outcomes, and promote collaboration through interdisciplinary teams. These components can help promote a patient-centered culture that ensures patients are involved in their care and that they make their own decisions. They are also empowered to partake in self-care, which has been shown to increase the overall quality of care and satisfaction. Ensuring that the patient’s beliefs, values, and attitudes are considered in decision-making ensures that they accept the interventions employed by the healthcare teams. Nurses can influence the adoption of interdisciplinary teams in the organization by advocating for the adoption of iCARE and providing evidence on how they can be essential in improving the achievement of organizational goals.
Abbasinia, M., Ahmadi, F., & Kazemnejad, A. (2019). Patient advocacy in nursing: A concept analysis. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019832950
Odom-Forren, J. (2020). Nursing resilience in the world of COVID-19. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 35(6), 555–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2020.10.005
Son?ur, C., Özer, Gün, Ç., & Top, M. (2018). Patient safety culture, evidence-based practice and performance in nursing. Systemic Practice & Action Research, 31(4), 359–374. https://doi-org.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9430-y
Straughair, C., & Machin, A. (2021). Compassion in nursing: exploring the perceptions of students and academics. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 36(7), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2021.e11720
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction
The type of work setting and interprofessional team features are described (improvement or type of team).25 pts
Introduction thoroughly describes the work setting and features of the interprofessional team.22 pts
Introduction describes the work setting and features of the interprofessional team.20 pts
One element from the first column is missing or lacks detail.10 pts
Two elements from the first column are missing and lack detail.0 pts
The introduction is missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Compassion
Nursing action related to compassion is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.25 pts
The nursing action related to compassion was clearly identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.22 pts
The nursing action related to compassion was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.20 pts
The nursing action related to compassion was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.10 pts
The nursing action related to compassion lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.0 pts
No Marks25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advocacy
Nursing action related to advocacy is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.25 pts
The nursing action related to advocacy was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.22 pts
The nursing action related to advocacy was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.20 pts
The nursing related to advocacy was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.10 pts
The nursing action related to advocacy lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.0 pts
The nursing action and support elements were missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Resilience
Nursing action related to resilience is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.25 pts
The nursing action related to resilience was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.22 pts
The nursing action related to resilience was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.20 pts
The nursing action related to resilience was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.10 pts
The nursing action related to resiliency lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.0 pts
The nursing action and support elements were missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence-Based Practice
Nursing action related to EBP is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.25 pts
The nursing action related to EBP was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.22 pts
The nursing action related to EBP was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.20 pts
The nursing action related to EBP was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.10 pts
The nursing action related to EBP was not sufficiently identified or one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.0 pts
The nursing action and support elements were missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summary
Explain how nursing actions of the iCARE components can support interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Address how you can influence support for interprofessional teams on your unit or area of practice.35 pts
Key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are thoroughly described.31 pts
Most key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are described.28 pts
Some key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are described13 pts
Summary lacks details of key points.0 pts
Summary is missing.35 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics and Organization
The discussion is well organized and logical. The structure is clear and compelling to the reader. Paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas stand out20 pts
Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: Well organized and logical, correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, professional wording is used, uses complete sentences, paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed clearly.18 pts
Good mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Few errors noted.16 pts
Fair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Some errors noted.8 pts
Poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Many errors noted.0 pts
Very poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A such that it is difficult to follow or understand.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
APA format is used throughout.20 pts
Excellent APA formatting with minimal errors of the following: All sources cited in the text -all references listed on the reference page using basics of APA format -title page in general APA format -headings present and follow APA format -12-point font, double spaced, 1 inch margins, paragraphs indented -used only one short quote and body of the paper is approximately 3 pages18 pts
Good formatting considering the elements listed in column A.16 pts
Fair formatting considering the elements listed in column A. Some APA errors noted.8 pts
Poor formatting considering the elements listed in column A. Many APA errors noted.0 pts
Very poor formatting such that paper is difficult to read. Numerous APA errors noted.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of CINAHL article as Required Source from CCN Library
0 pts
0 points deductedUsed CINAHL article from CCN Library0 pts
20 points (10%) deductedRequired article source of CINAHL not used resulting in point deduction0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0 pts
0 points deductedSubmitted on time0 pts
Not submitted on time – Points deducted1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late0 ptsTotal Points: 200Place your order to get best research help